If it involves some kind of fibre chances are I've at least tried it. This blog follows my adventures in sewing, dying, weaving, spinning, knitting and the rest. The best way to learn is by doing, well actually from learning from other peoples' mistakes, but when that isn't available...
Please, learn from my escapades!

Thursday 7 June 2012

monmouth evolution


Monmouth museum cap pattern evolution
The evolution of the patterning of this particular extant hat by modern knitters.
By Stephanie Goodchild, SCA THL Caelfind ingen Failtigerna

Description
The Cap from Monmouth
 “The Welsh border town of Monmouth was a centre for cap-making from 1520s to about 1585.  Monmouth caps were of peculiar design and were sold far and wide, becoming well known throughout England.” (Rutt, 58)
 “Little has been recorded of their appearance, except that they were round, brown, and topped with a button.” (Rutt, 58)  There is a particular cap at the Nelson museum in Monmouth that many have attempted to recreate and analyze.  “It was knitted in the round on four needles, entirely in stockinet, felted and shorn.  The dark wool is course thick 2 ply, knitted at a tension of 1 stitch to a centimeter (3/4 in).” (Rutt, 58)

The Yarn
During this time in history the common techniques used for yarn making are woolen yarns as opposed to worsted ones. “The crucial difference between worsteds and the woolens that supplanted them in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries lay in the fulling and finishing processes.” (Oldland, 97)  A woolen yarn will lend itself to the fulling process more readily than a worsted yarn will due to its structure of hairs lying in multiple directions rather than parallel, as in a worsted yarn.  “Shearman dressed the cloth by repeatedly napping the cloth with teasles and cutting it with shears, gradually lowering the nap, to produce the smooth, silky feel.” (Oldland 98).
Although this seems to be a very well known technique and many assume it was done to all woven wool garments, today the cap has very sharp stitch definition.   Whether this is an effect of time and degradation is unclear.



First Attempt:
Rutt interpretation of the Monmouth cap
Needles: size 6mm,
Yarn: Threads and Loops:  Cozy Wool (wool/acrylic blend) super bulky, 2-ply.

Cast on 59 stitches (it was recommended by Baroness Camilla to use a knitted cast on)
The brim of double fabric was shaped by increase or decrease at end of ea needle on 3rd round inside and outside hem.
The hem is 8 rounds deep
The cap is shaped with a decrease 3 times every 10th round at end of ea needle in 10th and 30th round
It is decreased in the middle of each needle in 20th round
After the 30th row, 50 stitches remaining
Decrease every 3rd and 2nd stitch in alternate rounds until 8 stitches remain
The remaining stitches are drawn together and topped with a button
A loop of 14 stitches is added at the back

The museum hat is measured by Rutt to be:
20cm (8 in) deep
55cm (22 in) circumference

My sample was 3.25 sts to the inch
5 rows to the inch.
The finished hat is 20” circumference and 8 7/8” deep

Picked up brim at knitted cast on and knit up into hat for brim.  This looks incorrect on the bottom edge. I may have misinterpreted what the Baroness’ opinion was of the brim section, but I thought that was what she recommended.

Second Attempt:
Ravelry pattern by “Neen”:
Needles: 8mm
Yarn: doubled Lion Brand Fisherman’s Wool (100% wool, worsted weight) as recommended by pattern.
Gauge: 2/5-3 sts to inch

Backward loop cast on 62 sts
Turn and knit back, and then join in the round.
Brim is 8 rows.
Decreases begin at round 17 and are more gradual than Rutt’s description.
Cast off with 11 sts.  Wrapping the tail around the bunch and then stitching through the bundle to create the “button”
Pick up on row 8 and knit down to original cast on from the inside.
Three needle bind off after turning the hat to the right side.
Chain stitches to create the loop.

My sample:
3 stitches to the inch
4.5 rows to the inch
overall size:  20” circumference, and 12” deep

Instructions say to “felt down to size”





Third Attempt
Using my own hand spun 2-ply Shetland wool. 
Gauge is approximately 2.75 stitches to the inch.
4 Rows to the inch
Hand made 8mm 12 inch dpns (made by my lord for this project J)
Using the museum image for a visual estimation of stitches and decreases, and the size description by Rutt.
Museum piece only appears to have six rounds of stitches for the brim.

Cast on 60 sts using backward loop method (as in 2nd pattern).
Two rounds knit.
Decrease fourth stitch on each of three needles on third round (visual from museum).
Continue knit rounds until round 19.
Decreases begin.
20:  1 decrease at the beginning of each needle
21:  2 decrease at the middle of each needle
22:  k1, *k2 tog, k3* repeat to end of round
23:  k2, k2 tog repeat to end of round
24:  k2 tog, k1 repeat to end of round
25:  k2, k2 tog repeat to end of round
26:  k2 tog, k1 repeat to end of round

Using bind off method from Humphrey’s pattern as it gives a very close visual approximation to the museum piece.  The work must be turned to the outside for the bind off to lay flat on the outside of the cap.
Pick up stitches on round six on the inside of the hat. (counted rounds on museum cap)
16 finger crochet stitches for loop.



Findings:
The measurements from the Rutt book say that the hat it only 8 inches deep and yet I estimated 50 rows to the hat from the museum photo.  That would be 6.25 rows to the inch and yet only 3 stitches to the inch.  The knitting does look compact but not distorted.  I would have to say that the smaller needle size would definitely be needed to achieve close to this row gauge.  I am wondering about the accuracy of these measurements from Rutt.



Works Cited

Rutt, Richard.  “A History of Hand Knitting” B T Batsford Ltd, London:  1987.

Oldland, John.  “The finishing of English woolens, 1300-1550.” P97, Medieval clothing and textiles 3.  The Boydell Press, New York:  2007. 

Hammarlund, Lena et alia.  “Visual Textiles:  A Study of Appearance and Visual Impression in Archaeological Textiles.” P69, Medieval clothing and textiles 4.  The Boydell Press, New York:  2008.

People to Thank for their input:

Colleen Humphreys “Neen” on Ravelry
Sally Pointer “SallyinWales” on Ravelry
Sarah  “MsMcKnittington” on Ravelry
Chris Laning “Claning” on Ravelry, SCA (Dame) Christian de Holacombe from the Kingdom of the West
Baroness Camilla